What should not be a reason for replacing existing vapor recovery equipment?

Replacing existing vapor recovery equipment should be guided by several factors related to performance, compliance, and safety. While cost-saving measures can play a role in equipment decisions, they should not be the primary reason for replacement. The primary focus of vapor recovery systems is to minimize environmental impact and ensure compliance with regulations, so decisions around their replacement should be based on operational efficacy, regulatory standards, and manufacturer guidance rather than solely on financial considerations.

Compliance with updated regulations is essential to avoid legal penalties and ensure that the equipment adheres to current environmental standards. Increased effectiveness, as affirmed by specific executive orders or industry advancements, ensures that the systems are functioning optimally to capture vapors, contributing to better environmental protection. Additionally, following manufacturer recommendations helps to ensure that the equipment operates safely and effectively, as manufacturers have knowledge of the latest technological developments and best practices.

In summary, while seeking cost savings is important in many business decisions, it should not outweigh the critical factors of compliance, effectiveness, and manufacturer guidance when it comes to the replacement of vapor recovery equipment.